Smallest Worthwhile Change: Individual vs Group
hiit-banner-post-header

Smallest Worthwhile Change: Individual vs Group

If you haven’t been living under a rock over past few years, you must be familiar with Will Hopkins work on magnitude-based inferences (MBI). One of the basis behind MBI is defining smallest practically meaningful change, or smallest worthwhile change (SWC). Together with Typical Error (TE) of a test, SWC is very needed in judging real individual changes of athletes (e.g. “Is Athlete’s B improvement in vertical jump height of 6 cm “real” given know TE of 2 cm? (which is variable/random error of the test)” ).

On the individual level SWC is defined either with the help of (a) domain knowledge (e.g. asking coaches what they think SWC is), (b) measurement error (if TE is 3cm, then SWC cannot be less than say 2 x 3cm, or 6cm, otherwise we are not very certain it is real change, rather the measurement fluke), or (c) using other athletes and using 0.2 x between athletes SD (or using 0.3 x individual SD, if we track athlete over multiple period of trials).

What is problematic here is the automatic use of SWC defined on the individual level, to judge magnitudes of changes of the group level. For example, is individual SWC is 2.5cm for the vertical jump, why it has to be the same for the group effects (for example mean change between pre- and post- samples).

In the video below I am using R simulation to brainstorm one idea using “common language” effect size (CLES) approach is judging SWC on the group level. With this video I wanted to start a conversation on this topic, and by no mean it is extensive. Please let me know if you have any feedback or ideas on this very topic.

My colleague Ivan Jukic and myself are working on a pre-print paper for PeerJ on the topic of (bootstrap) magnitude based predictions (bMBP),  which is more prediction-based rather than estimation-based approach for judging validity, reliability and effects/changes quite similar to CLES. In bMBP, besides MBI, we utilize an approach quite similar to CLES when judging effect size using an random athlete, SWC and TE. Will let you know when this paper is available. Watch this space


Website mentioned in the video: http://rpsychologist.com/d3/cohend/

Download R source code HERE

I am a physical preparation coach from Belgrade, Serbia, grew up in Pula, Croatia (which I consider my home town). I was involved in physical preparation of professional, amateur and recreational athletes of various ages in sports such as basketball, soccer, volleyball, martial arts and tennis. Read More »
free-memeber-button
free-memeber-button

Welcome to Complementary Training Community! Forums Smallest Worthwhile Change: Individual vs Group

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Mladen Jovanovic 1 month, 1 week ago.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

hiit-book-popup-banner