Create Custom Set and Rep Schemes With {STMr}
Introduction – Part 1: Theoretical Ramblings
“Hey coach, how much should I lift?”
Such a simple question demands a very complex answer. In my opinion, answering this question demands both “top-down” and “bottom-up” perspectives. From a simplistic viewpoint, the “top-down” approach deals with:
- Different types of lifters (i.e., strength specialists and strength generalists)
- Different domains – Hereby “domains” I refer to the group of goals or objectives we aim to achieve: 1) performance, 2) robustness, 3) blooks, 4) health and longevity, and probably, 5) fun as well. BTW, this is a working model.
- Different qualities that need to be pursued given the type of the lifter and the dominant domain
- Different quadrants – This is a model by Dan John, based on the number of qualities that need to be pursued and the individual level that needs to be achieved for each separate quality
- Training calendar constraints
- Training context (i.e., other training)
“Bottom-up” represents “where the rubber meets the road” perspective that deals with:
- Different heuristics or rules of thumb
- Training prescription using different models
- Training correction (i.e., quality control)
In this course, I will provide tools and heuristics from the “bottom-up” perspective. But before we jump straight into the {STMr} package and accompanying tools, I need to give some theoretical feedback that is required to understand the “whys” behind the percent-based prescription. Some of these will be familiar to the readers of the Strength Training Manual, but there are also some novel concepts I have been working on lately.
This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Mladen Jovanovic 1 year, 3 months ago.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.