FVP Course: Module 4 – Analysis- Part 4 - Complementary Training

Force-Velocity Profiling and Training Optimization Course:

MODULE 4: Analysis – Part 4

Agreement Analysis

In this video, I am providing extra material that deals with agreement analysis, as well as a pilot validity analysis between GymAware and Flex instruments. I am using bmbstats package, which you can read more about in the links provided below the video.

FVP Course

Ready to watch this course?
Take advantage of our promotional offer

Everything you need to know about Force-Velocity Profiling and Training Optimization


Take this CoursePromo Discount: 33% OFF

OR

Go Annual and Get All Bonuses for FREE!

Join Us TodayAnd Instantly Save $2140

Premium Membership

regular price $350

NOW $175/ first year


References

  1. Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 1986. “Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement.” Lancet (London, England) 1 (8476): 307–10.
  2. Borsboom, Denny. 2009. Measuring the Mind: Conceptual Issues in Modern Psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Giavarina, Davide. 2015. “Understanding Bland Altman Analysis.” Biochemia Medica 25 (2): 141–51. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.015.
  4. Hopkins, Will. 2015. “Spreadsheets for Analysis of Validity and Reliability.” Sportscience.org, 9.
  5. Hopkins, Will G. 2004b. “Bias in Bland-Altman but Not Regression Validity Analyses.” Sportscience.org. https://sportsci.org/jour/04/wghbias.htm.
  6. Hopkins, Will G. 2010. “A Socratic Dialogue on Comparison of Measures.” Sportscience.org. http://www.sportsci.org/2010/wghmeasures.htm.
  7. Jovanović M. 2020a.bmbstats: Magnitude-based statistics for sports scientists. Available at https://mladenjovanovic.github.io/bmbstats-book/
  8. Jovanović, Mladen. 2020b. bmbstats: Bootstrap Magnitude-Based Statistics. R-Package. Belgrade, Serbia. https://github.com/mladenjovanovic/bmbstats.
  9. Ludbrook, John. 1997. “SPECIAL ARTICLE COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT.” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 24 (2): 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb01807.x.
  10. Ludbrook, John. 2002. “Statistical Techniques for Comparing Measurers and Methods of Measurement: A Critical Review.” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 29 (7): 527–36. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03686.x.
  11. Ludbrook, John. 2010. “Linear Regression Analysis for Comparing Two Measurers or Methods of Measurement: But Which Regression?: Linear Regression for Comparing Methods.” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 37 (7): 692–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2010.05376.x.
  12. Ludbrook, John. 2012. “A Primer for Biomedical Scientists on How to Execute Model II Linear Regression Analysis: Model II Linear Regression Analysis.” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 39 (4): 329–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05643.x.
  13. Mullineaux, David R., Christopher A. Barnes, and Alan M. Batterham. 1999. “Assessment of Bias in Comparing Measurements: A Reliability Example.” Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 3 (4): 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee03041.
  14. Wallace, Michael. 2020. “Analysis in an Imperfect World.” Significance 17 (1): 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2020.01353.x.

Course Navigation

Introduction

Module 1: Installation

Module 2: Theory

Module 3: Measurement

Module 4: Analysis